DOI: 10.24019/issn.2532-0831 |
Online ISSN 2532-0831 |
|
![]() |
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vascular ResearchJournal website: http://www.vasculab.eu/jtavr.xmlJTAVR 2018;3(1): 37-40 |
![]() |
Occlusion of the popliteal artery after focused ultrasound treatment - a case report |
![]() |
|
FP Faccini1, JMC Souza2, AL Arendt3 |
||
1Vascular Surgery - Hospital Moinhos de Vento and Instituto de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, Brasil 2Clínica Angiovasc, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brasil 3Vascular Surgery - Hospital Moinhos de Vento and Instituto de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, Brasil |
||
submitted: Jun 20, 2019 accepted Jul 2, 2019 EPub ahead of Print: Jul 3, 2019 Published: Jul 7, 2019 |
Abstract The use of focused ultrasound and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is common in physical therapy and medical procedures. The ultrasound produces heat and can be used to treat several diseases. We report a case of a 49-year-old male that had a knee injury after mild trauma. The patient started physical therapy sessions to treat the injury. Ipsilateral calf claudication started a few hours after the focused ultrasound was used to heat the popliteal area progressing to symptoms of acute arterial occlusion in two weeks. We started anticoagulation and confirmed popliteal thrombosis with duplex scan and computed tomography. The 5 years follow up showed good clinical recovery and recanalization of the artery. This case reminds us that the focused ultrasound should not be considered harmless and life-threatening complications may occur. The inadvertent heating of neighboring structures and recanalization of the heated vessel may happen. |
|
Keywords High intensity focused ultrasound, Acute arterial occlusion, Popliteal artery occlusion, Thermoablation, Recanalization | ||
![]() since Jul 3, 2019 |
Full text ![]() |
|
back to the JTAVR issue | ![]() |